Legal Opinion

In Re Aultman Hospital

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1992No. 91AP-1192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bowman, Judge.

Appellant, Aultman Hospital, is an Akron hospital licensed to provide Level II perinatal care to newborn infants. 1 In May 1990, appellant requested a ruling from the Ohio Department of Health (“ODH”) indicating whether the implementation of Level III neonatal and obstetrical services at the hospital would be a reviewable activity under the Certificate of Need (“CON”) statutes. By letter dated July 6, 1990, ODH ruled that appellant’s delivery of Level III perinatal services would constitute a reviewable activity.

Appellant appealed ODH’s ruling of reviewability to the Ohio…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Professionals Guild of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fairview General Hospital v. FletcherOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Farrand v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. WickhamOhio Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Silver Lining Group EIC Morrow Cty. v. Ohio Dept. Edn. Autism Scholarship ProgramOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Access Ohio, L.L.C. v. GahannaOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Lind Media Co. v. Marion Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Four Winners, Inc. v. Columbus Development Regulation Division AdministratorOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Korey v. Hunting Valley Planning & Zoning Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API