Rohrbach v. Sanstrom
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Plaintiffs instituted this action to quiet title to certain tide lands fronting a government lot on Puget Sound, claiming title thereto by virtue of a deed from the state of Washington, dated September 18, 1928. Defendants assert title to a three-fifths interest in the lands under a patent from the United States and a chain of mesne conveyances. The patent was issued January 18, 1890, following the issuance of a receiver’s receipt dated August 10, 1888. It is undisputed that, by similar mesne conveyances based upon the same patent, plaintiffs are entitled to a two-fifths interest in these…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Horne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Russell v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kneeland v. KorterWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Shelton Logging Co. v. GosserWashington Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bavand v. OneWest Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Desimone v. SpenceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Centralia v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Magart v. FierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Turner v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.