Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of Houlton
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
BRODY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs, Houlton Citizens’ Coalition, William J. Faulkner, d/b/a Jack’s Trash Removal, Fred Spellman d/b/a Spellman Light Trucking, and David Condon, d/b/a White Knight Solid Waste Disposal, request that the Court enjoin Defendant, Town of Houlton (“Houlton” or “the Town”), from enforcing the Town’s 1997 Solid Waste Management Ordinance (“Ordinance” or the “1997 Ordinance”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of ClarkstownSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. WunnickeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of HoultonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Houlton Citizens' Coalition v. Town of HoultonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1998
- Houlton Citizens' v. Town of HoultonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999