Legal Opinion

State v. Saponen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1939No. 31,889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge and abuse of a female child under the age of 18, defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The picture of lechery disclosed by record and argument need not be redrawn. On the question of defendant’s guilt (which he has stoutly denied from the first) there is plenty of evidence to support the verdict. The main question for the jury was doubtless one of identification, which was resolved against defendant.

The point decisive of this appeal arises from the state’s impeachment of its own…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Crago v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. FriendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Pullen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. State v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. State v. MlynczakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API