Legal Opinion

State v. Jensen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1922No. 22,372PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Blue Earth county charged with the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child under the age of 18 years, tried in the district court for that county before Oomstock, J., and a jury, and found guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, and from Ihe judgment, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Defendant was indicted for the crime of having carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of 18 years. The same girl was prosecutrix in State v. Morehart, 149 Minn. 432, 183 N. W. 960, and State v. Swan, 151 Minn. 215, 186 N. W. 581. Defendant was convicted and appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial and, separately, from the judgment of conviction. There are 59 assignments of error. We discuss only _ those upon which appellant principally relies.

1. The prosecutrix testified that she made defendant’s acquaintance when she visited Mankato for a day or two early in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDuff v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. State v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. DolliverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SaporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. State v. GulbrandsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Edwin Arnold Kraft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. Hansen v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. State v. GuySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API