Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Nash Finch Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 20, 1993No. C5-92-2171PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Edward Hunter appeals from summary judgment entered in favor of Nash Finch Company on his claim of disability discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(2), (6) (1990). We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Edward Hunter was hired to work in respondent Nash Finch Company’s warehouse facility in August 1989. During his initial employment interview, Hunter informed the warehouse supervisor that he was missing two fingers of his left hand, and the supervisor responded by stating that “it’s against my better judgment to hire you.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Schachtner v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- County of Lake v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fink v. KitzmanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Kelly Renee Neumann v. At & T Communications, Inc., Kelly Renee Neumann v. At & T Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Gates McDonald Co., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- McKay v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1995
- Braziel v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.