McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. Charles H. Phillips Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
We have held the registered trade-mark “Milk of Magnesia” invalid because it was not in the actual and exclusive use of the defendant, or its predecessors, during ten years next preceding February 20, 1905, as required by section 5 of the Federal TradeMark Act (15 USCA § 85), and also because the defendant had abandoned the mark. But we said that this invalidity of the mark “Milk of Magnesia” did not affect the defendant’s other trade-mark “Leche de Magnesia.” In reaching this conclusion about “Leche de Magnesia,” we gave too little consideration to tho fact…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Orange Crush Co. v. California Crushed Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- In re Maclin-Zimmer-McGill Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Marsh Capron Mfg. Co. v. Bates Machine & Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pizzeria Uno Corporation v. James W. Temple, Jr., D/B/A Taco UnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Northern Paper MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. Charles H. Phillips Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Sutton Cosmetics (P. R.) Inc. v. Lander Co., Inc., Scott Chemical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Sutton Cosmetics (P. R.) Inc. v. Lander Co., Inc., Scott Chemical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972