Legal Opinion

Orange Crush Co. v. California Crushed Fruit Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 7, 1924No. 1631PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appellant, alleging that it had built up a very extensive trade in the beverages “Orange Crush” and “Lemon Crush,” prior to the adoption by appellee of the mark “Suncrush,” instituted an opposition proceeding against the registration of the latter term. The tribunals of the Patent Office, while ruling that the marks were applied to goods of the same descriptive properties, dismissed the opposition; the ground of the Assistant Commissioner’s decision being that orange crush and lemon crush are aptly descriptive.

Appellee, in its petition for registration, states that its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. Wallach Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. Graser-RotheU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1908

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. American Aloe Corporation v. Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  4. Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Alexander B. Stewart OrganizationsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Applied Mechanical Technology, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API