Legal Opinion

In re Maclin-Zimmer-McGill Tobacco Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 5, 1920No. 1241PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Application by the Maclin-Zimmer-McGill Tobacco Company, Incorporated, to register a trade-mark. From a decision refusing registration, the applicant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a Patent Office decision refusing registration to the words “El Gallo,” as a trade-mark for tobacco.

“El Gallo” is the Spanish for “The Rooster,” and it appears that “Our Rooster” and a picture of a rooster have been registered as a trade-mark for tobacco by another concern. In Nestle & A. S. C. Milk Co. v. Walter Baker & Co., 37 App. D. C. 148, 152, we ruled that “Milkmaid” and a pictorial representation of a milkmaid meant the same to the public, and that the “right to employ one necessarily includes the right to employ both.” It matters not that appellant…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pizzeria Uno Corporation v. James W. Temple, Jr., D/B/A Taco UnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Riverbank Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. In Re Northern Paper MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  4. Pink Lady Corporation v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  5. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. Charles H. Phillips Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API