Legal Opinion
Womack v. Houk (In Re Bangert)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana
Decided March 11, 1998No. 19-60085PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN L. PETERSON, Chief Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, the Plaintiff Joseph V. Womack, Trustee in the underlying Chapter 7 bankruptcy ease, seeks avoidance of two transfers of property under the alternative theories of preferences under 11 U.S.C. § 547, or as fraudulent transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(2). The Defendants, judgment creditors Jack Houk and Lucilla Houk (together the “Houks”) oppose the Trustee’s claims. This matter was submitted on stipulated facts and memoranda of law which have been reviewed by the Court. This matter is ripe for decision.
I. STIPULATED FACTS
The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilcox v. CSX Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of 360Networks (USA) Inc. v. AAF-McQuay, Inc. (In Re 360Networks (USA) Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Garden Ridge Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Malloy v. St. John Medical Center (In Re Woodward)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
- Menchise v. Steffen (In re Steffen)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.