Illinois Central Railroad v. City of Chicago
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shore
On the 27th of December, 1888, the president and trustees of the village of Hyde Park, a municipal corporation then existing, organized under the general City and Village act, adopted an ordinance for the opening and extension of Sixty-fourth street in the village, from the west line of Stony Island avenue to Woodlawn avenue, “and for such purposes the following described property be condemned and appropriated, to-wit: That part of the right of way of the Illinois Central Bailroad Company lying between the north and south lines of Sixty-fourth street extended west across said right of way…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Smith v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Central City Horse Railway Co. v. Fort Clark Horse Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Sears v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Illinois Cities Water Co. v. City of Mt. VernonIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Tacoma Safety Deposit Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.