Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shore

On the 27th of December, 1888, the president and trustees of the village of Hyde Park, a municipal corporation then existing, organized under the general City and Village act, adopted an ordinance for the opening and extension of Sixty-fourth street in the village, from the west line of Stony Island avenue to Woodlawn avenue, “and for such purposes the following described property be condemned and appropriated, to-wit: That part of the right of way of the Illinois Central Bailroad Company lying between the north and south lines of Sixty-fourth street extended west across said right of way…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Smith v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Central City Horse Railway Co. v. Fort Clark Horse Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sears v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Illinois Cities Water Co. v. City of Mt. VernonIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Tacoma Safety Deposit Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API