Stoner v. Devilbiss
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First and Second Exceptions stated in the opinion of the Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First and Second Exceptions stated in the opinion of the Court. Third Exception. — The plaintiff then asked the witness the following question: “ Since the -death of David Foutz, the testator, and after the 20th day of September, 1887, have you or not heard Joseph Foutz, one of the executors, say anything on the subject of this claim of the plaintiff, and if so, what have you heard him say, and when did he say it?” and the plaintiff stated to the Court that he, the plaintiff, offered said proof…
1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.
The appellee sued the apjjellants, executors of David Eoutz deceased, for services renderedthe deceased, David Foutz, in his life-time from the year 1862 to 1881. The account exhibited and passed by the Orphans’ Court is for $100 per annum for the period named, or $2,500. The declaration says the plaintiff sues the executors of David Foutz “for money payable by the defendants’ testator to the plaintiff for goods bargained and sold by the plaintiff to the defendants’ testator;” then follow counts for work done, and materials provided at the request of defendants’ testator, for money lent, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mims v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Snedeker v. WarringNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- McCann v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nottingham Village, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- McCall's Ferry Power Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Murray v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982