Browning-Ferris Industries of Alabama, Inc. v. Alabama Dept. of Environmental Mgmt.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge;
This appeal is taken from the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claim for declaratory relief as not ripe for adjudication. Upon consideration of both “the fit*1474ness of the issues for judicial decision” and “the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration,” Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 149, 87 S.Ct. 1507, 1515, 18 L.Ed.2d 681 (1967), we find that the facial challenges to the Alabama statute at issue here are indeed ripe for adjudication, in view of the particular facts presented to us. We, thus, reverse the decision of the district…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Browning-Ferris Industries Of Alabama, Inc. v. Alabama Dept. Of Environmental Mgmt.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986