Legal Opinion

Leuch v. Egelhoff

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

It is established that during the time the plaintiff was special counsel for the city of Cedarburg the tree trimmers were hired, the work was being done, and the first pay ment of $500 was made on July 30, 1946. Defendants assert, therefore, that plaintiff is estopped from pursuing this action.

Plaintiff is a taxpayer and brings this action for himself and on behalf of all other taxpayers and property owners of the city of Cedarburg. In McGowan v. Paul (1910), 141 Wis. 388, 392, 123 N. W. 253, the right of a taxpayer to bring action was questioned, and it was stated:

“It would not militate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cawker v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McGowan v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State Ex Rel. Federal Paving Corp. v. PrudischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. S. D. Realty Co. v. Sewerage Commission of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Blum v. City of HillsboroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Glendale Development, Inc. v. Board of Regents of the University of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Leuch v. EgelhoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Glendale Development, Inc. v. Board of Regents of the University of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API