Legal Opinion

Williams Typewriter Co. v. Cleaver

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1909No. Appeal, No. 92PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 92, Oct. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Northumberland Co., Dec. T., 1904, No. 220, on verdict for defendant in case of The Williams Typewriter Company v. C. L. Cleaver, publisher of the “ Daily News.” Assumpsit on a contract of sale. Before Auten, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned among others was in giving binding instructions for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

On December 16, 1903, the defendant entered into a written contract with the plaintiff for the purchase - of three Williams typewriters, one roll-top desk and two eight-drawer desks for the sum of $405, payable four months after date, with the privilege of paying the same prior to maturity on mutually satisfactory advertising mileage to be renewed until used. The undisputed evidence shows that the agreement was executed in the borough of Mt. Carmel, Pennsylvania, and that the printed contract was presented by plaintiff’s agent to the defendant for execution when the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colonial Trust Co. v. GetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Miller v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  3. Jones v. Jennings Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Hartley & Co. v. CorboySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Alexander v. BuckwalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vilsack v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Pittsburgh Hardware & Home Supply Co. v. BownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API