Legal Opinion

Hartley & Co. v. Corboy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1892No. Appeal, No. 228PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal, No. 228, Jan. T., 1892, from judgment of C. P. Bedford Co., April T., 1891, No. 159, on verdict for plaintiff, in assumpsit on promissory note. The evidence, on the trial before Baer, P. J., is stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The note in suit was given to renew a prior note for the same amount between the same parties.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 228, Jan. T., 1892, from judgment of C. P. Bedford Co., April T., 1891, No. 159, on verdict for plaintiff, in assumpsit on promissory note. The evidence, on the trial before Baer, P. J., is stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The note in suit was given to renew a prior note for the same amount between the same parties. After the time was changed from four months to ninety days and an additional indorser added, plaintiff wrote the name of the new indorser on the face of the note, but subsequently erased it before maturity. Upon maturity, demand was made upon the note as a…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

Before the note in suit was offered in evidence, one of the plaintiffs, William Hartley, was examined as a witness on behalf of the plaintiffs, and testified to the circumstances in which the note was received and discounted. He said when the note was brought to them it “ was drawn for four months, *27■with James Corboy as indorser.” He further said that they concluded they would not accept a note for four months, and they sent it back to Steckman, the maker, with a message that they would not renew the note for four months, but would for three months with an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Simpson v. StackhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  3. Craighead v. McLoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Neff v. HornerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Hill v. CooleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Colonial Trust Co. v. GetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Hershberger v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Citizens National Bank of Baltimore v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Gettysburg National Bank v. ChisolmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API