Legal Opinion
Querim v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 2000No. 97 Civ. 4031(RPP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PATTERSON, District Judge.
All defendants move to dismiss the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, the motions are granted as to all eight counts of the First Amended Complaint.
Background
The following facts are alleged in plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, dated August 22,1997.
Plaintiff John Querim (“Querim”) has been employed by the New York Times Company (the “Times”) as a casual nonunion pressman since 1992 and was, at the time of the First Amended Complaint, listed on the Times’ casual…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sash v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Lacey v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In re Lacey)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Smith v. JenkinsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- PRZYWIECZERSK v. BLINKENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- PRZYWIECZERSK v. BLINKENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021