Legal Opinion
Woolsey v. Haynes
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 10, 1908No. 2,723PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity to cancel a deed and for specific performance. The controversy grows out of the following state of facts, substantially: The appellee, Playnes, from February 9, 1905, to August 16, 1905, was the owner of an undivided one-fifth part of certain mining claims situate in what is known as the “California Mining District,” in Lake county, Colo. The other interests, belonged to various parties, which, prior to August, 1905, had passed by deeds to the appellant Fanny T. Fackler, the sister of the appellant Kate T. Woolsey. Mrs. Fackler resided during…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Atlantic Delaine Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Johnson v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Mastin v. NobleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Forrester v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leach & Co. v. PeirsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kopald Electric Co. v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Stipel v. PiggottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- South Memphis Land Co. v. McLean Hardwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914