Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Scoville

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Lafayette Common Pleas Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, Judge

This action is in the nature of a suit in chancery, brought by plaintiff to divest defendant of title to Lot é, Block él, in the first addition to the City of Lexington, and vest the same in said Emogene E. Forrester, by whom the plaintiffs claim the money was furnished with which said lot was bought.

Upon issues submitted' to a jury, embracing the facts as to the ownership of the money, a verdict was had in favor of plaintiffs, and thereupon the Court entered a decree as prayed in the petition.

I have examined with care the testimony in the cause and am satified from such examination, that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ringo v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Allen v. LoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Curd v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Ferguson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Berry v. HartzellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API