Legal Opinion

Clarke v. LR SYSTEMS

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 6, 2002No. Civil Action CV-99-5219 (DGT)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TRAGER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Walter Clarke brings this products liability action against defendant LR Systems and Lasits Rohline Service, Inc. (“LR Systems”) 1 for injuries he suffered in an industrial accident on August 13, 1996. Clarke originally brought suit in the Supreme Court of Kings County against LR Systems and Dayton Electric Manu-faeturing Company. The complaint charged these defendants with negligence and strict products liability, and breach of implied and express warranty. The case was removed to federal court based on diversity, and Clarke’s employer,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  2. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. LindorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Henry v. Rehab Plus Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  4. Maxwell v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  5. West v. Bell Helicopter, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API