Legal Opinion

State v. Aetna Banking & Trust Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1906No. 2,319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Ciarle County; J. M. Clements, Judge. Action by the state against the Aetna Banking and Trust Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.’

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

The state of Montana and the Aetna Banking and Trust Company, acting under the provisions of section 2050 of the Code of Civil Procedure, submitted to the district court a case. containing an agreed statement of the facts upon which the controversy then existing between them depended. The court found for the Aetna Banking and Trust Company, and judgment was entered accordingly. From that judgment the state appeals.

The agreed statement of facts discloses that since 1901 the Aetna Banking and Trust Company has been a foreign corporation engaged in a banking business at a known and fixed *381place…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Spraigue v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. State v. Cudahy Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Lewis & Clarke CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Criswell v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shubat v. Glacier CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. BowkerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Town of White Sulphur Springs v. VoiseMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. Lutey Bros.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State Ex Rel. Penhale v. State Highway PatrolMontana Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API