Legal Opinion

Criswell v. Montana Central Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On Reheabing.

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

Having decided by the opinion of the chief justice that section 697 of the Compiled Statutes of 1887 *168(Fifth Division) modified the common law rule in regard to the liability of railroad companies to their servants for the negligence of servants of a higher grade (17 Mont. 189), the court granted a rehearing upon this further question, which was not urged upon the original argument, but which became vital in consequence of the views of the court, namely : TV hat effect did section 11 of Article XY of the constitution of the state have upon said section 697 of the Compiled Statutes ?

Section 697…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washingtonian Home v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Norton v. Board of Comm'rs of Taxing Dist. of BrownsvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Criswell v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Oakes v. MaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Daily v. MarshallMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wastl v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Arie v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API