Commonwealth v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Packel, J.,
The defendant, tried with three others, was alone found guilty of aggravated robbery and conspiracy. He contends, first, that the court below should have suppressed evidence obtained incident to an unlawful arrest and, second, that the evidence was insufficient for either conviction.
The undisputed evidence was that a woman’s pocketbook was taken from her person by an unidentified individual. Shortly thereafter police officers, patrolling 12 blocks away and unaware of the incident, halted an automobile that they observed being driven without lights and in a reckless…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Commonwealth v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. SoudaniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. NaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RoscioliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- State v. AngelucciSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MarkovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. King, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.