Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sanders

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 903 and 904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

The evidence presented in this non-jury case is not sufficient to support a conviction of larceny. The verdict is vacated and the matter remanded for sentencing on the charge of attempted larceny.

The Commonwealth’s principal witness was the arresting officer. His testimony may be summarized as follows: On August 24, 1967, appellant and another man approached a parked car, which the officer had been watching because it had been reported as having been stolen. The appellant got into the car behind the steering wheel. The other man went under the hood with a length of wire…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. KozlowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Commonwealth v. NaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. DockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AlamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. FarmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. FarmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API