Commonwealth v. Markovitch
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence. After a hearing, appellant, Anne Markovitch’s motion to suppress evidence and non-verbal statement was denied by a suppression court. Appellant was found guilty by a jury of crimi nal conspiracy, 1 manufacture, delivery or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance 2 and possession of drug paraphernalia. 3 Post-verdict motions were inadvertently filed late by trial counsel. Trial counsel then filed a petition for leave to file a motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment nunc pro tunc. After a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BachertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StackfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. McBrideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. SopotaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.