Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Markovitch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1989No. 674PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence. After a hearing, appellant, Anne Markovitch’s motion to suppress evidence and non-verbal statement was denied by a suppression court. Appellant was found guilty by a jury of crimi nal conspiracy, 1 manufacture, delivery or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance 2 and possession of drug paraphernalia. 3 Post-verdict motions were inadvertently filed late by trial counsel. Trial counsel then filed a petition for leave to file a motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment nunc pro tunc. After a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. BachertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StackfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. McBrideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. SopotaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API