Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tucker v. Frinzi

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1996No. 306A95Published

1Opinion of the Court

474 S.E.2d 127 (1996)

344 N.C. 411

STATE of North Carolina ex rel. Lea Anna Lefeavers TUCKER

v.

Carl FRINZI

No. 306A95.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 6, 1996.

Michael F. Easley, Attorney General by Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Edward P. Hausle, P.A. by Edward P. Hausle, Greenville, for defendant-appellee.

PARKER, Justice.

Plaintiff State of North Carolina filed this action against defendant Carl Frinzi seeking to establish paternity, set child support, and recover reimbursement for public assistance paid to support the minor child. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Tucker v. FrinziSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Settle by and Through Sullivan v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API