Legal Opinion
Rutland Cable T. v. Inc. v. City of Rutland
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 2, 1960No. 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Shan^raw, J,
This is a petition brought to this court for a writ of mandamus. The city of Rutland filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the petition was not directed to the proper officers of the city. The motion to dismiss was overruled pro forma. An interlocutory order was made by this Court directing that the complaint be served on each member of the City Council of the city of Rutland, which has been done. As the case now stands the petitioner seeks to compel the city of Rutland, and the City Council of the city, as petitionees, to advertise in a newspaper its application for a permit to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Town of Glover v. AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Proctor v. HufnailSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Zaccagnini v. Vandergrift BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Carpenter's Admr. v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
- Crystal Brook Farm, Inc. v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Vermont Criminal Justice Training CouncilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Murphy Motor Sales v. First Nat. Bank of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Corcoran v. Village of BenningtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Rutland Cable T v. Inc. v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Eastern Advertising, Inc. v. CooleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.