Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Hufnail

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 5, 1940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The petitioners, Basil N. Proctor and Ruth M. Proctor, are here seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the defendants, the board of school directors for the town of Reading, to furnish facilities for the transportation of their son Robert between his home and the school at Felehville in said town “equal with the facilities which are furnished other students of said school resident in the same vicinity. ’ ’ They also ask that said school board be ordered to pay to them reasonable and equitable compensation for such transportation as they have already furnished their said son between his home…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. United States Ex Rel. Tucker v. SeamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  4. Sanborn v. WeirSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. Carey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  2. Corcoran v. Village of BenningtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  3. Gerard Couture v. Selectmen of BerkshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  4. Lewis v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  5. Buttolph v. OsbornSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API