Legal Opinion

Kayser v. Hodopp

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1889No. 13,465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

Suit by August Kayser and Frederick Hagner, partners, doing business under the firm name of Kayser & Hagner, against Mary A. Hodopp and Anthony Sauer upon a promissory note.

There was an answer in one paragraph, setting up special matters in defence, to which a demurrer was overruled, and upon which issue was afterwards joined.

*429A trial by the court terminated in a finding and judgment for the defendants, and error is assigned upon the overruling of the demurrer to the answer and upon the refusal of the court to grant a new trial.

The following facts were established at the trial. Charles Hodopp…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowder v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cole v. LafontaineIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Moncrief v. MoncriefIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Henry v. RitenourIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Rogers v. ZookIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Archibald v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Dairyman's State Bank v. DunhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  3. Taylor v. VandegriftIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API