Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 846PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

The question presented by this appeal is whether appellant’s counsel at the sentencing hearing was ineffective.

1

The facts are relatively simple. Appellant pleaded guilty to two counts of sale of heroin. At the sentencing hearing his counsel argued as a mitigating circumstance that appellant was not involved in drug trafficking but made the sales only to assist a young woman; according to counsel, the young woman was addicted and suicidal, so appellant sold her the heroin, at cost, to tide her over and on the condition that she seek help at a drug treatment center. In reply, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FarrarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. CruzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. SmillieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. KessingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API