Commonwealth v. Cruz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court manifestly abused its discretion in sentencing appellant because it relied in part upon unsubstantiated hearsay that appellant dealt in large quantities of illegal drugs. We conclude that appellant has not preserved this issue for our review and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of sentence.
On March 22, 1978, appellant pled guilty to two counts of selling heroin in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. § 780-113(f)(l). The charges stemmed from two sales, each of two packets of heroin. On May 12,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. P.L.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MedleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. DudenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. AldingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.