Frost v. Hoar
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
“No school district shall raise or appropriate money at any special meeting of the inhabitants thereof .. . unless the ballots cast at such meeting shall be equal in number to at least one hah of the number of voters of such district entitled to vote at the regular meeting next preceding such special meeting.” P. L., c. 120, s. 3; Laws 1927, c. 56, s. 2. A like restriction is in force with respect to the special meetings of towns and village districts. P. L., c. 42, s. 5; P. L., c. 57, s. 4; Laws 1927, c. 56, s. 1.
Ordinarily, where no rights of third parties have attached, as is the case…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sawyer v. Manchester & Keene RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1882
- Attorney-General v. ShepardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1882
- Attorney-General Ex Rel. Woodbury v. BickfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Childs v. Hillsborough Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dal Maso v. County Commrs.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- DAL MASO v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- McDonnell v. Town of DerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Nash Family Investment Properties v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Bedford Chapter-Citizens for a Sound Economy v. School Administrative Unit 25-Bedford School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.