Legal Opinion

Godfrey & Candler v. Huson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1935No. 10597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, Justice.

1. The evidence showed that subsequently to the alleged parol gift of the vacant property in dispute the defendants’ predecessor acquired title to adjacent property by a warranty deed containing a covenant mutually binding him and the grantor, under whom petitioners claim title to other property adjacent to the vacant property, not to *484enclose or improve the vacant property. Therefore the alleged title by parol gift to the vacant lot became merged in the rights and restrictions as to the vacant lot, as expressed in the warranty deed conveying the adjacent property now owned by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosen v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Morgan v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Keiley v. Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Loftis v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Nelson v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Smith v. Pindar Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Spencer v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Reid v. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Grove Lakes Subdivision, Inc. v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API