Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Leo Farley

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 1956No. 575_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant’s motion to the trial court for leave to appeal forma pauperis was denied on July 30, 1956 by a written memorandum of the trial judge who therein certified that the appellant had failed “to show merit” in his appeal. *576This was not sufficient to bring the certificate within 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a), par. 2, which provides: “An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Generally an application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis will have sufficient substance to warrant consideration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Waterman v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Gerringer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Wheeler v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  5. Kyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Farley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Griffin v. DoeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
  4. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. Charles Leo FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API