Legal Opinion

Kyle v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1952No. UndocketedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Arnold Thomas Kyle, the petitioner herein, has petitioned the United States District Court for the District of Oregon for a speedy trial or dismissal of an indictment returned to the above mentioned district court. The petition was denied in toto and' petitioner seeks to appeal in forma pauperis and has presented his application to this court for permission to do so.

No showing is made that such a petition for permission to appeal in forma pauperis has been made or presented to the court from which the appeal has been taken, and for that reason the petition is denied. Smith v. Johnston, 9…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. In re SnowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  3. Minntole v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles Leo FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Burdix v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Burdix v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Eddie L. Burdix v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. Charles Leo FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API