Legal Opinion
Charles T. Coleman, Sr. v. Michael C. Turpen, District Attorney Bill Vinzant, Sheriff Keifer Wrecker Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1983No. 80-2017PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Charles Coleman appeals from the district court’s dismissal of a civil action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 He names three defendants in his suit: a sheriff, a prosecutor, and an automobile wrecking company. Mr. Coleman alleges that the defendants, acting under color of state law, deprived…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Porro v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Gallagher v. Neil Young Freedom ConcertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.