Legal Opinion

Fry v. Keiter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1911No. Appeal, No. 217Published

Appeal, No. 217, Oct. T., 1910, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Chester Co., Aug. T., 1909, No. 32, sustaining exceptions to report of borough directors in case of J. Harry Fry et al. v. Hosea B. Keiter. Exceptions to report of A. T. Parke, Esq., auditor. Before Hemphill, P. J. Errors assigned were in sustaining various exceptions to the report of the auditor.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This case had its origin in the audit, by the borough auditors, of the accounts of the appellee as borough treasurer. From this report three taxpayers appealed to the common pleas, and, in support of their appeal, specified error in the allowance of a credit of $525, which it is conceded was paid by the treasurer on three warrants, regular on their face, which were drawn, by order of council, in favor of the Methodist Church, Esther Kugler and William Winner, in consideration of releases of damages to their respective properties, occasioned by the opening of certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lower Augusta v. SelinsgroveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Dunmore Borough School District v. WahlersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Appeal of GangewereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Thomas v. Upper Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Mohney v. Redbank Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API