Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Upper Merion Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1892No. Appeal, No. 156PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 156, July T., 1892, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., June T., 1890, No. 42, on verdict for plaintiff, Harry C. Thomas. Issue directed by the court, under act of April 15,1834, sec. 104, to try the question whether certain claims of plaintiff against defendant were legal. At the trial before Weand, J., the jury found for the plaintiff. Defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 156, July T., 1892, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., June T., 1890, No. 42, on verdict for plaintiff, Harry C. Thomas. Issue directed by the court, under act of April 15,1834, sec. 104, to try the question whether certain claims of plaintiff against defendant were legal. At the trial before Weand, J., the jury found for the plaintiff. Defendant appealed. The opinion of Weand, J., refusing a new trial before discussing the merits of the case, stated, “ As the questions raised involve a consideration of the act of 13th June, 1836, we think it reviewable, and not…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

We are all of opinion that no appeal lies in this case. It is ruled by appeal of Gangewere, 61 Pa. 342.

Appeal quashed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appeal of GangewereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diamond Street, PittsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Dunmore Borough School District v. WahlersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Lower Merion Township v. ClineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Fry v. KeiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API