Legal Opinion

Mohney v. Redbank Township School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1888No. 56PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error, No. 56, Oct. T., 1888, to C. P. Clarion Co., to review a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a case-stated wherein the Redbank Township School District was plaintiff, and A. T. Mohney was defendant, at Aug. T., 1887, No. 203. Green, J., absent.

Read the full summary

Error, No. 56, Oct. T., 1888, to C. P. Clarion Co., to review a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a case-stated wherein the Redbank Township School District was plaintiff, and A. T. Mohney was defendant, at Aug. T., 1887, No. 203. Green, J., absent. The case stated was as follows : “ W. A. Warnick was collector and treasurer of the school district of Redbank township, for the year ending the first Monday of June, 1886, and, on or about the expiration of his said term, his accounts as such treasurer were settled by the township auditors, in which settlement exonerations to amount of…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

As a writ of error does not lie to the court below on an appeal from an auditor’s report, we order the writ to be quashed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fry v. KeiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API