Legal Opinion

Golland v. Golland

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action to have a secret trust judicially declared. ■

1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.

The plaintiff says that a gift in his mother’s will, absolute in form, was subject to a secret trust, which he asks the court to declare, and, declaring, to enforce. Fredericka Golland died in September, 1911, the owner of two houses in the city of New York. She left six children. Two of them, Morris and Jacob, were successful business men, possessed, it was then supposed, of ample wealth. Two, a daughter Annie and a son Isaac, had been deaf and dumb from birth, had been judicially declared insane and were inmates of asylums. Two others, a daughter Amelia, and a son Israel, the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Security Warehousing Co. v. HandSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Rosseau v. . RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Eisenlord v. . ClumNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Goldsmith v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oursler v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. In re the Estate of BuehlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  3. Colgrove v. GoodyearMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brecht v. BentleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. Oursler v. ArmstrongNew York Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API