Legal Opinion
Oursler v. Armstrong
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.
This action as pleaded in the third amended complaint is brought to impress a constructive trust upon property received by Grace Oursler under the will of *655Charles Fulton Oursler and that the defendants be declared to be the trustees for the benefit of the plaintiffs for certain percentages claimed to be due to the plaintiffs.
Findings of fact and conclusions of law have been waived.
The plaintiffs are the children and grandchildren of Charles Fulton Oursler of his first marriage. The defendants are the children of a second marriage contracted by Charles Fulton Oursler and the executors of his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Wallace v. . WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Hermann v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Ahrens v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958
- In re the Probate of the Will of DixNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- In re the Estate of SwanteeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
- Rich v. MottekNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Rich v. MottekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.