Legal Opinion

Willis-Winchester Co., to Use v. Clay

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1928No. Appeal, 176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

At the trial of this suit, the court below gave binding instructions in favor of plaintiffs; a verdict and judgment were entered accordingly. Defendants asked for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial, both of which were refused; this appeal followed.

Plaintiffs moved to quash the appeal, whereupon an order was made stating that the motion would be finally-disposed of when the merits of the case came before us for argument.

The motion to quash is based on the ground that the warrant of attorney to enter judgment has coupled with it an express waiver of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Curry v. Bacharach Quality Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Caveny v. CurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. M'Dowell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  5. Dumn v. RothermelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rome Sales & Service Station v. FinchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Holland Furnace Co. v. Keystone Dehydrating Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Burg v. Betty Gay of Washington, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Feingold v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Bernstein v. ColletrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API