Legal Opinion
Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 15, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’HARA, Judge.
Plaintiffs filed a complaint for a declaratory judgment, asserting their right to recover damages under an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant covering a 1969 Pontiac Tempest. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
Plaintiff Morgan’s decedent was fatally injured and plaintiff Rust severely injured on September 12,1976 when the 1969 Pontiac automobile, driven by Eugene Sheets, collided with a freight train near Newark, Delaware. At the time of the collision the automobile was titled in the name of Catherine M. Russell and Helen S. Schmidt (Mrs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haynes v. LinderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Phoenix Insurance v. GuthielNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Beatty v. Western Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Lawrence A. Clouse and Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin v. American Mutual Liability Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Cammile v. SandersonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Gray v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1995
- Krutz v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991