Legal Opinion

Thorkildsen v. Belden

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2011No. S-10-0154PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Chief Justice.

¶1] After this Court affirmed judgment in his favor in an action filed against him for payment on a loan, Belden v. Thorkildsen, 2008 WY 145, 197 P.3d 148 (Wyo.2008) (Belden II), John Thorkildsen filed a motion for attorney fees. The district court ultimately denied the motion and Mr. Thorkildsen appealed. We reverse.

ISSUE

¶2] The issue for this Court's determination is whether the district court erred when it denied Mr. Thorkildsen's motion for attorney fees.

FACTS

¶3] This case is before us for the fourth time. Margot Belden and her son were part ners in a business, Fish…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Lieberman v. MossbrookWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cline v. Rocky Mountain, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Forshee v. DelaneyWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Claman v. PoppWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hunter v. ReeceWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Evans v. MoyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Kimberly Shindell v. Roger ShindellWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Wallop Canyon Ranch, LLC v. GoodwynWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API