Legal Opinion

Forshee v. Delaney

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2005No. 04-126PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellees Tom and Deany Delaney, d/b/a Delaney Irrigation (Delaney), filed suit against Frank and Nancy Forshee (Forshee) seeking to be paid for Delaney’s work installing a pivot irrigation system on farmland owned by Forshee. Forshee counterclaimed against Delaney, seeking damages for crop loss due to delays in the system becoming operational. The district court found in favor of Delaney on Delaney’s claim, against Forshee on Forshee’s counterclaim, and awarded Delaney attorneys fees. Forshee appeals the judgment on the issues of the initial claim and the award of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Surety Co. v. Lamb Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ruby Drilling Co., Inc. v. Duncan Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Wallop Canyon Ranch, LLC v. GoodwynWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Thorkildsen v. BeldenWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Weiss v. WeissWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API