Legal Opinion

Koenig v. Northern Insulation Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1984No. C9-84-720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

Employer and insurer seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming the compensation judge’s award to employee of continuing temporary total disability compensation from December 5, 1982, and medical expenses incurred to treat aggravation of an ulcer, allegedly secondary to a work-related back injury employee suffered on October 28, 1980. We affirm the determination that employee is entitled to continuing disability benefits but reverse the determination that the expenses for treatment of his ulcer are compensable.

Employee was unable to do…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fitzgibbons v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Hendrickson v. George Madsen Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Rohr v. Knutson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Pedersen v. Maple Island Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Schander v. Northern States Power CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Shogren v. Bethesda Lutheran Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API