Barton v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CROW, Judge.
Movant George Henry Barton appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his pro se motion per Rule 29.15, Missouri Rules of Criminal Proce-
dure (19th ed. 1988), to vacate his conviction of felony stealing and ten-year prison sentence. The conviction, a result of trial by jury, was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Barton, 753 S.W.2d 331 (Mo.App. 1988).
Movant’s brief presents three assignments of error. We consider them in the order presented.
The first alleges the pro se motion pled facts which, if proved, would warrant relief, consequently the motion court erred…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sloan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Lingar v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. FractionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. StatlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JenningsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Barnett v. RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Gilliland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BrewsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Poole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.