Legal Opinion

Patten v. California State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1951No. Civ. 7900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the California State Personnel Board and California Employment Stabilization Commission to employ petitioner in the Department of Employment as a permanent civil service employee in the class of Unemployment Insurance Examiner, Grade 3.

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the petitioner in July of 1945 received a civil service appointment on a “regular” or “permanent” basis, as he contends, or on a “duration” basis, as contended by respondents.

The facts are not substantially…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Whaley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Piccinini v. California Emergency Management AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API