Legal Opinion
Neman v. Commercial Capital Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 2009No. B208164PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 1989, Congress enacted the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, which is often referred to by the acronym FIRREA, and is codified at title 12 United States Code section 1821(d) (the act). The act was designed to provide for takeovers of failed federally insured banking institutions. And the act was designed to provide a smooth mechanism for the rehabilitation and disposal of claims against such institutions. (Yeomalakis v. F.D.I.C. (1st Cir. 2009) 562 F.3d 56, 60; Marquis v. F.D.I.C. (1st Cir. 1992) 965 F.2d 1148, 1154.)…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Barbara Ronda Meliezer, Wife Of/and Karl A. Loetzerich v. Resolution Trust Company, as Receiver for Home Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Microfinancial, Inc. v. Premier Holidays International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saffer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- California Bank & Trust v. Piedmont Operating PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013