Legal Opinion
Harris v. Olszewski
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2006No. 04-2479, 05-1047PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, Michigan’s Department of Community Health (the “department” or “State”) urges us to reverse the district court’s entry of summary judgment against it in two cases brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of a class of Michigan residents. The district court enjoined the department from enforcing a single-supplier contract for all incontinence products to Michigan’s Medicaid recipients. On appeal, the department challenges the district court’s holdings that: (1) Medicaid’s freedom-of-choiee provision, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)(A),…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of Indiana State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Christ the King Manor, Inc. v. Secretary United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Derek Waskul v. Washtenaw Cnty. Community Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Eduardo Guzman v. Sandra ShewryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Planned Parenthood of Kan. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.